You are here

Compilation

Adding new files using rosetta classes went wrong

Category: 
Compilation

Hi,

I am writting some files using the classes in rosetta,changing *settings files as the readmefile indicated,as a example,i wrote a class calculateTT using classes like Pose,Movemap etc,and when i recompiled it,it showed error as following:

Post Situation: 

Compiling cxx=icc; "icc: command not found"

Category: 
Compilation

I'm having what I imagine to be a simple to solve problem where I'm just missing something. I am running on RHEL5 and trying to build Rosetta 3.5. I have the Intel Composer compiler v15.0.2. I know that no newer than about 11 is shipped in the config options, but I've successfully updated the file before to go so far as 14.0.1. In any case, this appears to be failing well before that would matter. The following occurs when I try to build:

Post Situation: 

Building 3.4 on Debian Linux 7.8 (wheezy) using g++ 4.7.2

Category: 
Compilation

I get the following error that terminals the build process:

src/protocols/jd2/SingleFileBuffer.cc:148:13: error: 'sleep' was not declared in this scope

It would appear that for this system "sleep" is found in the <unistd.h> include file.

Anybody else had this problem ?

Or is this a "dead" issue since 3.4 will not be getting any more updates ?

Post Situation: 

Using "make_project.py all" omits "basic.dylib" from link binary with libraries in Xcode 6

Category: 
Compilation

Hello.

Just switched to a new Macbook pro that came with Yosemite and Xcode 6. I downloaded rosetta_bin_mac_2015.02.57538_bundle.

While trying to run "make_project.py all", I had to copy the version.py into the "main/source/xcode" directory from the "main/source" directory.

Starting up Xcode and opening the project, some modules (like basic) compiled with no problems. However, when it tries to compile core.1 (and other targets), I get the following error:

Post Situation: 

cannot find -lcr Rosetta3.5 installation

Category: 
Compilation

Dear 'Rosettaers',
I'd tried to compile the Rosetta3.5 on my Server[1] and I couldn't. I tried to compile Rosetta using this command: scons bin mode=release -j 24 extras=mpi,static cxx_ver=4.6 cxx=gcc After a few minutes of compilation the error came and it is following:

Post Situation: 

Access to latest CS-ROSETTA tools

Category: 
Compilation
Structure prediction
Fragment Generation

Have been trying to access the latest CS-ROSETTA tools without success for several days. Looks like www.csrosetta.org has been down for a while.

Any alternative to www.csrosetta.org to access latest cs-rosetta tools?

Post Situation: 

Can anyone become a Rosetta developer?

Category: 
Compilation

Rosetta's end-user documentation is very poor. I think that if I studied the source code of some applications, I could understand better how they work. However, studying the source code of a large project such as Rosetta requires a lot of help. I'm guessing that the Rosetta's developer resources (listed here: https://www.rosettacommons.org/dev) would help, but that requires a password (ex., https://wiki.rosettacommons.org/). How do you get this password?

Post Situation: 

Empty bin after compilation

Category: 
Compilation

Dear Rosetta Users,

I downloaded the most recent release rosetta2014.52 and compiled the source code on a Linux 64 bit machine with the command: ./scons.py -j4 mode=release bin. The compilation seemed successful as I saw the "scons: done building targets" message. But the bin/ was empty though the build/src contains newly generated files. Looking at the log file, I found these lines:

Post Situation: 

Combine flags file with command line arguments?

Category: 
Compilation
Structure prediction
Docking
Design
Scoring
Enzyme Design
Loop Modeling
Constraints
Symmetry
Small Molecules
Chemically Modified Residues
Fragment Generation
Membrane
Non-Canonical Peptides
Nucleic Acids
Phenix / MR Rosetta

Is it possible to combine a flags file with command line arguments?

For example, something like this:

minimize_with_cst.linuxgccrelease -in:file:l min_pdb_file_list @flags_file

where flags_file contains additional options. Moreover, what is the effect of changing the order of command line arguments and flags files? Which takes precedence? That is, what is the difference between the above command and:

minimize_with_cst.linuxgccrelease @flags_file -in:file:l min_pdb_file_list

Thanks.

Post Situation: 

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - Compilation