You are here

Design

RosettaScripts filter BuriedUnsatHbonds2 missing still

Category: 
Design

Hello, 

Can the BuriedUnsatHbonds2 filter be pushed to release? It gets called in a rosetta scripts xml included in the supplementary materials for this paper (published in 2017): DOI: 10.1126/science.aan0693

 

Thanks!

Post Situation: 

symmetric design w/ hbnet and unsatisfied_buried_penalty score terms

Category: 
Design

Hi All,

I am working on designing some symmetric structures and am currently using REF2015 + hbnet. In addition, I want to add the buried_unsatisfied_penalty. When I add this term to the score function, it works and can score 'non-symmetrized' structures just fine. However, when I try to score a structure that has been 'symmetrized' I get the following error: 

File: /home/benchmark/rosetta/source/src/core/pack/guidance_scoreterms/buried_unsat_penalty/graph/BuriedUnsatPenaltyGraph.cc:637

[ ERROR ] UtilityExitException

Post Situation: 

Can I believe the antibody design result?

Category: 
Design

I am trying to do antibody design with the  RosettaAntibodyDesign, but some of my colleagues told me that they fell to obtain successful designers with the  RosettaAntibodyDesign (RAbD). They ran the RosettaAntibodyDesign on the crystal structure of an ab-ag complex with a dG_seperate of about -20 REU, and got some designers with dG_seperate of about -40 REU. However, they did experiments including ELISA and SPR and found that these antibody designers did not bind to the antigen at all!

Post Situation: 

How to use MHC Epitope energy (mhc_epitope) to deimmunize a protein structure?

Category: 
Design

Dear all,

The MHC Epitope energy (mhc_epitope) alogrithm  (https://www.rosettacommons.org/docs/latest/rosetta_basics/scoring/MHCEpitopeEnergy) is for deimmunization of epitopes. However I cannot understand how to use it. 

I used the pdb file 2b3p.pdb and the score controlling script in the introduction webpage as the inputs and run the following command:

Post Situation: 

core.pose.util: [ ERROR ] Can't find residue type 'UNK' in type set of mode fa_standard

Category: 
Design

Dear developers,  

I tried to follow the antibody design protocol from the Nature protocol articles but unfortunately I keep getting the following error when I try it:

core.pose.util: [ ERROR ] Can't find residue type 'UNK' in type set of mode fa_standard

This is my command line: 

antibody.default.linuxgccrelease -ignore_unrecognized_res -fasta antibody_chains.fasta

and this is the content of  ROSETTA_CRASH.log:

Post Situation: 

antibody.mpi.linuxgccrelease some antibodies failing to model

Category: 
Design

Hello all, I am using the antibody.mpi.linuxgccrelease to model multiple antibodies. Most work fine but about 10% are failing with weird error messages.  I have tried everything to figure out the problem but am having no luck. These antibodies are clinical molecules, and so I feel like my failure rate is pretty high, and I'm probably doing something wrong.  There is not a lot of documentation about the (newer) antibody homology modelling application and so I am a little bit at a loss as what to do to make the program more robust. Thanks as usual for all your help!!!

Post Situation: 

location of define_interface.py

Category: 
Design

Hello,

I am following the protein design steps presented in the Dr Mieler lab. One of the steps is to generate resfile with  define_interface.py script. I checked my rosetta/tools/protein tools/scripts path, but there is not such a file. Where can I find this script?

Thank you

Post Situation: 

Help with filtering (Rosetta scripts)

Category: 
Design

Hello

I'm running running a pilot ROSETTA script to get the GreedyOptMutation mover with the ddg filter to work. But I get this error message;

ERROR: ERROR: No acceptable mutations found. All possible mutations failed at least one filter!

Any ideas on how to get the filter to allow trajectories with mutations that improve ddG and increases affinity between the 2 proteins contained in the .pdb?

My .xml looks like this:

 

<ROSETTASCRIPTS>

Post Situation: 

RosettaRemodel gives no increased output when setting higher -num_trajectory

Category: 
Design

I am trying to design a helical linker between two strongly interacting subunits that connects their termini using RosettaRemodel.

I am running remodel with the following flags in mpi mode and get the desired output (around 2-4 structures with -num_trajectory 32). However when I increase -num_trajectory to e.g. 1000 I still get only around 2-4 strucures out (named 1.pdb 2.pdb ...). while computation time increases drastically.

Post Situation: 

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - Design