You are here

Symmetry

Symmetry breaks due to small structure gaps

Category: 
Symmetry

Hi everyone,

I'm having trouble re-designing a 2-component symmetric nanoparticle with small gaps along lines that connect symmetry axes. The starting pdb looked good, so I selected 2 chains that define the unit cell and apply a symmetry file to enable the computational savings associated with symmetry. However, the symmetric docking step that's triggered by the rosetta.protocols.symmetry.SetupForSymmetryMover method seems to smush the chains together, resulting in a smaller radius nanoparticle with VdW clashes.

Post Situation: 

calcium metal nomenclature: Rosetta_cm confusing HETATM CA (calcium) with ATOM CA (alpha-carbon)

Category: 
Structure prediction
Constraints
Symmetry
Membrane

Dear community,

I had this posted under a different sub-forum but I realized it didn't fit that forum so deleted it and reposting here.

Post Situation: 

MPI optimization on TACC stampede2 HPC

Category: 
Structure prediction
Loop Modeling
Symmetry
Membrane

Dear community,

I am new to MPI so please correct any misuse of terms. My question is about optimizing for MPI on an HPC or a second (preferred) solution to my issue is to optimize my RAM usage so I don't have to run MPI, serial would actually improve overall models produced anyways.

Post Situation: 

Metal Ion in symmetric design

Category: 
Design
Symmetry

I would like to run a design protocol on a protein that has, as its asymmetric unit, 2 proteins with an ion. I have done some purely AA-based symmetric design before with 2 chains controlled by separate virtual jumps and my own python-generated symdef file but I'd rather avoid doing that again :-) 

My hope was that I could put (even if suboptimal) the 2 chains and the ion in a single chain and proceed as usual in symmetric design with one chain.

Post Situation: 

Structure refinement for helical assembles using Rosetta

Category: 
Symmetry
Hi all, I'm very new using Rosetta to make structure refinement. I'v read lots of related articles and also read the Tutorial: Rosetta tools for structure determination in cryoEM density. But I still not sure how to start my first Rosetta try.
Post Situation: 

How to fold-and-dock in PyRosetta?

Category: 
Structure prediction
Docking
Symmetry
PyRosetta

I'd like to do something similar to regular Rosetta fold-and-dock but in PyRosetta.  I've looked at D060_Folding.py and D100_Docking.py examples and while I (mostly) understand what each is doing, I have no idea how to combine them.

How to get a foldtree with symmetry? (in my case it's just simple C3) 

How to combine folding and docking?  Just alternate calls to folding.apply(test_pose) and dock_prot.apply(test_pose)?  (It can't be that simple...)

Post Situation: 

Transmembrane helix fold-and-dock?

Category: 
Structure prediction
Docking
Symmetry
Membrane

I'd like to fold-and-dock a trimeric transmembrane domain.  I mostly have the "Fold And Dock" working following the example in demos/public/symmetry_examples/fold-and-dock/.  However this is treating the transmembrane helixes as though they are in solvent (so for example any hydrophilic groups always rotate outwards).  I'd like to do something which is a combination of "Membrane Abinitio" and "Fold and Dock".  Is this possible, and how do I do it?

Post Situation: 

How to specify constraints during fold-and-dock?

Category: 
Structure prediction
Docking
Constraints
Symmetry

I'm folding a protein which is a trimeric long helix bundle.  I started from the main/demos/public/symmetry_examples/fold-and-dock/ and added my info (sequence, fragments etc).  This basically works but a lot of the resulting folds are globular not long - the helixes fold over on themselves.  I'd like to constrain this to extended conformations only.

I looked at constraints in the Rosetta docs, and tried creating input_files/constraints.cst to give a penalty to any structure which has less than 50-70 A distance between residues 1 and 63:

Post Situation: 

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - Symmetry