# Solved

The problem has been solved

## Rosetta Antibody: Unable to open file and terminates

Category:
Compilation

Hello, please note I'm revising my posting with some major updates, apologies to the 9 viewers who have come here prior as this will read completely different.

I'm encountering a read error with antibody_H3. Below is the executable I ran (I've also reproduced the error with .static mode):

mpiexec -np 4 $ROSETTA3/bin/antibody_H3.cxx11threadmpiserialization.linuxgccrelease \ @abH3.flags abH3.flags looks just like: Post Situation: ## PyRosetta on Ubuntu 16.04 build error Category: Compilation - OS type/version/arch: Linux Ubuntu 16.04 (on an Azure virtual machine) - Python version: 3.5 - Version of PyRosetta including SVN revision number. PyRosetta4.Release.python35.ubuntu.release-236.tar.bz2 - Version of Rosetta: Rosetta 3.11 for Linux Hello, I've installed PyRosetta and upon importing in Python3.5 I receive the following error: Post Situation: ## Confusion for Input Tutorial Category: Compilation Hi All, I have downloaded Rosetta 3.11 and built it with Scons.py using$ ./scons.py -j 4 mode=release bin

The building of the binaries seems to work correctly providing me with:

scons: done building targets.

I am now attempting to familiarize myself with Rosetta by traversing the tutorials starting with the Input & Output Tutorial so I am within this directory:

Post Situation:

## compiling with intel c++ compiler

Category:
Compilation

Intel compiler has problem dealing with defaulted and virtualized copy assignment operator, reported here.

Because of this bug, compilation with intel compiler fails at rosetta_bin_linux_2019.35.60890_bundle/main/source/src/protocols/genetic_algorithm/Entity.hh line 55.

By implementing it explicitly, or removing "virtual" seems to be a solution.

Post Situation:

## running in MPI mode and multiple scores per output PDB file?

Category:
Design
Scoring

Hi Forum
I recently did a Rosetta fixbb run with MPI and found that the score file had a lot more lines of output than there were actual PDB files. Specifically, I've got 353 scores in score.sc but only 12 PDB files.  is it possible that the parallel processors are simply overwriting the PDBs?   Is there a flag I should be including to avoid this?

Thanks!

Post Situation:

## GrowLigand

Category:
Small Molecules

Hi all,

Anyone with experience with the GrowLigand mover?

I have as input a holo.pdb structure with a protein target of interest and a small molecule inhibitor which binds with low affinitty (parametrized to be used with genpot).

I was hopping that this mover would return possible modifications on the ligand so I could rationalize my next steps of synthesis.

Here is my RosettaScripts:

Post Situation:

## cryptic error "Got some signal... It is:15" -- an issue with 'fixbb', or something else?

Category:
Design

Hello Forum

I'm trying to run fixbb on my cluster here, and everything seems to have been going well for a while, but it suddenly stopped and spit out the following in the log file:

Post Situation:

## Speed problem when running RosettaLigand ligand docking

Category:
Docking

Hello, I am trying to do protein design using a protocol derived from RosettaLigand ligand docking.

When I run Rosetta Design as the following command line, everything seems correct and there are output structures (pdb files). The problem is that it takes ages to get the results. In average, it will take 15~20 mins to get one models. For 1000 models, it spent 9 days. I think there is something wrong, but I don't know how to solve it.

Post Situation:

## Make error during installation of updated ncbi-blast-2.9.0+-src plus error with nr-database

Category:
Fragment Generation

Dear fellows,

my recent situation with setting up the fragment generation for structure prediction ab initio consists in follow:

- It seems as if I solved my problems with version compatibility of gcc-compiler and the environment variable FRAGMENT_PICKER.

- But a problem with installation of updated make_fragments.pl and install_dependencies.pl is still remained unsolved. I carried out next actions with the ncbi-blast-2.9.0+-src package:

Post Situation:

## Ligand question - aromatic bonds not being enforced?

Category:
Constraints
Small Molecules
Nucleic Acids

Hi,

I am trying to run Local Relax on an ADP-bound protein structure. I cleared the first hurdle to make a ligand params file, and the program runs fine and includes the ligand. I made the params file by taking ADP from a related structure, converted it to mol2 using iBabel, and made the params file using molfile_to_params.py

Post Situation: