You are here

Home

Small Molecules

-ignore_unrecognized_res doesn't work

Submitted by e3lm on Fri, 2022-05-06 14:47
Category: 
Small Molecules

Hi, I'm minimizing structures in a list of PDB's using the -l option. Some structures have different ligands which I'd like to ignore or skip. The -ignore_unrecognized_res doesn't work. Minimize got bumped out trying to fill in missing atoms. Apparently it did not see or understand the flag.

Post Situation: 
Unsolved
Forums: 
Rosetta 3 - General

Pose is full atom and mover expects centroid, how do I handle it the best?

Submitted by hlinn on Thu, 2022-01-27 05:55
Category: 
Small Molecules

I'm trying to use pyrosetta.rosetta.protocols.quantum_annealing.ExternalPackerResultLoader for a project of side-chain packing small peptides with a fixed backbone. I've gotten as far as building the Mover: instantiate the mover, giving it rebuild info and the string with selected rotamers.

The problem I run into comes when I try to apply it to the starting pose; I get a warning:

Post Situation: 
Unsolved
Forums: 
PyRosetta - General

Problems with waters in CoupledMoves application

Submitted by Corvin on Tue, 2021-11-16 07:16
Category: 
Structure prediction
Docking
Small Molecules

Kind strangers,

I am writing you in a hope that the following problems will be resolved with your help.

I am trying to write such the XML-protocol for CoupledMoves, which will modulate the ligand interaction with (glyco)protein in water environment. Without water (ExplicitWater and following PackRotamerMover) it works fine. But with water molecules inclusion I face with multiple problems.

Post Situation: 
Unsolved
Forums: 
Rosetta 3 - Applications

small molecule charge generated by molfile_to_params.py

Submitted by rohi on Wed, 2021-03-17 09:35
Category: 
Small Molecules

Hello,

I am performing Rosetta Ligand docking for a ligand, let 's say A . The ligand A is in contact with both water and water vapor. I have two main quesions and I would really appreciate your help in this regard:

1. Do I need to explicity consider water in my docking as a separate ligand with the ligand A? Or is the implicit solvation in scoring function sufficient?

Post Situation: 
Unsolved
Forums: 
Rosetta 3 - General

Protonating all possible sites: the problem in MOL2 file format or the innate Rosetta feature(bug)?

Submitted by Corvin on Wed, 2020-12-16 04:58
Category: 
Docking
Small Molecules
Chemically Modified Residues

Dear Sir and Madam,

I have performed a lot of attempts in order to conduct the coupled_moves docking with ligand without it protonation. I need to specify that this ligand (in his physiologically active form) has only one Hydrogen on his sulfonamide site. Nevertheless, despite the absence of any other Hydrogens both in input .params, MOL2 and PDB file, a lot of sites (sulfonamide Nitrogen with additional undesirable Hydrogen, as well as some Carbons on a benzene ring and tail) get protonated.
By the way, Ligand_Dock application also protonates all possible ligand sites.

Post Situation: 
Unsolved
Forums: 
Rosetta 3 - Applications

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - Small Molecules